home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.driving      Automobile discussion (general)      162,179 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 160,180 of 162,179   
   The Daring Dufas to Bob F   
   Re: Fuel comparison charts   
   29 Jun 13 17:09:23   
   
   XPost: alt.home.repair, rec.autos.tech   
   From: the-daring-dufas@stinky-finger.net   
      
   On 6/29/2013 4:54 PM, Bob F wrote:   
   > The Daring Dufas wrote:   
   >> On 6/28/2013 9:38 PM, Dean Hoffman > wrote:   
   >>> On 6/28/13 9:32 PM, . wrote:   
   >>>> "Dean Hoffman" <""dh0496\"@win*&dstr$%eam.net"> wrote in message   
   >>>> news:kqlgq8$9je$2@speranza.aioe.org...   
   >>>>> On 6/27/13 9:16 PM, RBM wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> I think this stuff is just the only successful technology   
   >>>>>> currently available that meets the EPA standards for diesels. It   
   >>>>>> doesn't matter who the manufacturer is, all diesel trucks in the   
   >>>>>> U.S. made after 2010 have the same stuff strapped on to them.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>     This new crap is even showing up on farm equipment and   
   >>>>> irrigation power   
   >>>>> units.   It might make sense to limit emissions on city buses, but   
   >>>>> on farm   
   >>>>> equipment?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> It MIGHT make sense to limit emissions on city buses?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>      Depends on the trade offs.   
   >>>   
   >>>    The U.S. government keeps increasing the fuel mileage standards,   
   >>> for example.   Vehicles are being made lighter as a result.  How   
   >>> many more people are killed or injured because of that?   Suppose we   
   >>> had vehicles sturdily built like the ones from the 50s 60s with   
   >>> modern safety features?   
   >>   
   >> "The Law Of unintended Results" It's what happens when Congress   
   >> designs anything and imposes by law, impossible or insanely difficult   
   >> to implement standards. The "Won't Flush Toilets" were one of plumbing   
   >> fixtures designed by Congress. ^_^   
   >   
   > My car is safer, and my toilet works just fine, better than the old one I   
   > replaced. Thank you congress.   
   >   
      
   We have one of the first ones to come out and it's a horror story. It   
   takes two to three flushes to clear it. My friend GB on the other hand   
   had one of the toilets containing a pressure tank and the thing will   
   geld you if you flush it while seated on the throne. My 63 Dodge was   
   safe because anyone seeing it coming got the heck out of my way. ^_^   
      
   TDD   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca