home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.driving      Automobile discussion (general)      162,178 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 160,181 of 162,178   
   Frank to The Daring Dufas   
   Re: Fuel comparison charts   
   29 Jun 13 18:57:17   
   
   XPost: alt.home.repair, rec.autos.tech   
   From: frankdotlogullo@comcast.net   
      
   On 6/29/2013 6:09 PM, The Daring Dufas wrote:   
   > On 6/29/2013 4:54 PM, Bob F wrote:   
   >> The Daring Dufas wrote:   
   >>> On 6/28/2013 9:38 PM, Dean Hoffman > wrote:   
   >>>> On 6/28/13 9:32 PM, . wrote:   
   >>>>> "Dean Hoffman" <""dh0496\"@win*&dstr$%eam.net"> wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:kqlgq8$9je$2@speranza.aioe.org...   
   >>>>>> On 6/27/13 9:16 PM, RBM wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I think this stuff is just the only successful technology   
   >>>>>>> currently available that meets the EPA standards for diesels. It   
   >>>>>>> doesn't matter who the manufacturer is, all diesel trucks in the   
   >>>>>>> U.S. made after 2010 have the same stuff strapped on to them.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>     This new crap is even showing up on farm equipment and   
   >>>>>> irrigation power   
   >>>>>> units.   It might make sense to limit emissions on city buses, but   
   >>>>>> on farm   
   >>>>>> equipment?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It MIGHT make sense to limit emissions on city buses?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>      Depends on the trade offs.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    The U.S. government keeps increasing the fuel mileage standards,   
   >>>> for example.   Vehicles are being made lighter as a result.  How   
   >>>> many more people are killed or injured because of that?   Suppose we   
   >>>> had vehicles sturdily built like the ones from the 50s 60s with   
   >>>> modern safety features?   
   >>>   
   >>> "The Law Of unintended Results" It's what happens when Congress   
   >>> designs anything and imposes by law, impossible or insanely difficult   
   >>> to implement standards. The "Won't Flush Toilets" were one of plumbing   
   >>> fixtures designed by Congress. ^_^   
   >>   
   >> My car is safer, and my toilet works just fine, better than the old one I   
   >> replaced. Thank you congress.   
   >>   
   >   
   > We have one of the first ones to come out and it's a horror story. It   
   > takes two to three flushes to clear it. My friend GB on the other hand   
   > had one of the toilets containing a pressure tank and the thing will   
   > geld you if you flush it while seated on the throne. My 63 Dodge was   
   > safe because anyone seeing it coming got the heck out of my way. ^_^   
   >   
   > TDD   
   >   
      
   I'm happy with the toilets.  Probably later models.  Figure they help   
   keep septic drain field dry.  But, I don't need somebody holding my hand   
   or pushing me to make my decisions.   
      
   CFL's are a good example.  I'm in favor of them in fixtures kept on for   
   long periods of time but those in the bathroom often last only 6 months   
   because of short term use.   
      
   Point is that one size does not fit all and that is the problem with   
   government over regulation.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca