Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,181 of 162,178    |
|    Frank to The Daring Dufas    |
|    Re: Fuel comparison charts    |
|    29 Jun 13 18:57:17    |
      XPost: alt.home.repair, rec.autos.tech       From: frankdotlogullo@comcast.net              On 6/29/2013 6:09 PM, The Daring Dufas wrote:       > On 6/29/2013 4:54 PM, Bob F wrote:       >> The Daring Dufas wrote:       >>> On 6/28/2013 9:38 PM, Dean Hoffman > wrote:       >>>> On 6/28/13 9:32 PM, . wrote:       >>>>> "Dean Hoffman" <""dh0496\"@win*&dstr$%eam.net"> wrote in message       >>>>> news:kqlgq8$9je$2@speranza.aioe.org...       >>>>>> On 6/27/13 9:16 PM, RBM wrote:       >>>>>>       >>>>>>> I think this stuff is just the only successful technology       >>>>>>> currently available that meets the EPA standards for diesels. It       >>>>>>> doesn't matter who the manufacturer is, all diesel trucks in the       >>>>>>> U.S. made after 2010 have the same stuff strapped on to them.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> This new crap is even showing up on farm equipment and       >>>>>> irrigation power       >>>>>> units. It might make sense to limit emissions on city buses, but       >>>>>> on farm       >>>>>> equipment?       >>>>>       >>>>> It MIGHT make sense to limit emissions on city buses?       >>>>>       >>>>>       >>>> Depends on the trade offs.       >>>>       >>>> The U.S. government keeps increasing the fuel mileage standards,       >>>> for example. Vehicles are being made lighter as a result. How       >>>> many more people are killed or injured because of that? Suppose we       >>>> had vehicles sturdily built like the ones from the 50s 60s with       >>>> modern safety features?       >>>       >>> "The Law Of unintended Results" It's what happens when Congress       >>> designs anything and imposes by law, impossible or insanely difficult       >>> to implement standards. The "Won't Flush Toilets" were one of plumbing       >>> fixtures designed by Congress. ^_^       >>       >> My car is safer, and my toilet works just fine, better than the old one I       >> replaced. Thank you congress.       >>       >       > We have one of the first ones to come out and it's a horror story. It       > takes two to three flushes to clear it. My friend GB on the other hand       > had one of the toilets containing a pressure tank and the thing will       > geld you if you flush it while seated on the throne. My 63 Dodge was       > safe because anyone seeing it coming got the heck out of my way. ^_^       >       > TDD       >              I'm happy with the toilets. Probably later models. Figure they help       keep septic drain field dry. But, I don't need somebody holding my hand       or pushing me to make my decisions.              CFL's are a good example. I'm in favor of them in fixtures kept on for       long periods of time but those in the bathroom often last only 6 months       because of short term use.              Point is that one size does not fit all and that is the problem with       government over regulation.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca