Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,218 of 162,178    |
|    Nate Nagel to James Silverton    |
|    Re: License plate spray    |
|    20 Jul 13 14:07:28    |
      From: njnagel@roosters.net              On 07/19/2013 03:55 PM, James Silverton wrote:       > On 7/19/2013 2:38 PM, Nate Nagel wrote:       >> On 07/19/2013 12:12 PM, James Silverton wrote:       >>> On 7/18/2013 10:14 PM, richard wrote:       >>>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:10:24 -0700 (PDT), necromancer wrote:       >>>>       >>>>> On Thursday, July 18, 2013 10:33:15 AM UTC-4, James Silverton wrote:       >>>>>> Has anyone experience of using those expensive cans of spray-on       >>>>>> paint to       >>>>>>       >>>>>> foil roadside cameras?       >>>>>       >>>>> IIRC, Mythbusters debunked this one...       >>>>       >>>> they did. I saw the show a few times and if anything, the stuff       >>>> actually       >>>> made the plates show up better.       >>>> the best way to hide the plates is to have a flip plate.       >>>> anytime you go through a TLC intersection, flip a swith and the plate       >>>> changes to a temporary tag or one of those specialty gag plates.       >>>> a minute later it flips back.       >>>>       >>> I guess I'll have keep on making careful note of where the speed cameras       >>> are. They move the damn things around unfortunately.       >>>       >>       >> Check out radardetectorforum.org specifically the "passive       >> countermeasures" forum.       >>       >> Most of the sprays are just useless. There is apparently a product       >> called "Laser Veil" that does provide some benefit, but the drawback is       >> that it must be applied to both the license plate and any forward facing       >> lights, and it's a) tinted (undesirable, because it looks like you've       >> applied something, and also reduces the output of your lights) and b)       >> can be washed off by alcohol, which means that if you have headlight       >> squirters it'll ruin your application eventually.       >>       >> Additionally, it doesn't completely prevent a laser speed gun from       >> getting your speed, it just buys you an extra second or so before it can       >> lock.       >>       >> I see from your .sig that you're in MD, my best advice would be to run       >> Waze or Trapster on your smart phone to alert you to the location of       >> fixed cameras, and just try not to speed. I know, it's hard with some       >> of the SLs in the metro DC area but there is no real defense against a       >> cop with a handheld laser gun other than an active jammer.       >>       >> You could also run a good radar detector with laser detection       >> capabilities like a V1, but honestly the laser detection just tells you       >> that you've been nailed because of the nature of laser; even the best       >> detectors will only alert a fraction of a second before the speed gun       >> locks onto you. That isn't legal in DC or VA (and neither is a laser       >> jammer) though as I'm sure you know. The main use for that is to alert       >> you to the location of the cameras while you're driving legally so when       >> you drive the same roads again you'll be vigilant of your speed whether       >> or not Waze alerts you - it won't save you from a ticket.       >>       >> I'm assuming that everyone knows that radar jammers are illegal       >> everywhere in the US, although to the best of my knowledge all the speed       >> cameras in MD are laser not radar.       >>       > I'm usually fairly cautious but I've been caught three times in the past       > two years by automatic cameras, which often appear on the squeaky wheel       > principle. These are more of a mildly costly nuisance ($40, no points)       > but, so far, the radar gun cops have not caught me in this period.              Definitely try out Waze then...              unfortunately, the usual response to "people are speeeeeeeding!" anymore       doesn't seem to be a rational discussion of whether perhaps the speed       limit is too low, it just prompts the installation of a camera.              nate              --       replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.       http://members.cox.net/njnagel              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca