Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,278 of 162,178    |
|    Nate Nagel to thekmanrocks@gmail.com    |
|    Re: Negotiating multiple Left/Right-Turn    |
|    29 Oct 13 08:32:13    |
      From: njnagel@roosters.net              On 10/24/2013 04:28 PM, thekmanrocks@gmail.com wrote:       > On Thursday, October 24, 2013 4:02:43 PM UTC-4, Harry K wrote:       >> On Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:44:53 AM UTC-7, thekma...@gmail.com       >> wrote:       >>       >>> I'm sure there's at least one within ten miles of where most of       >>> us RADs live, where two or more left lanes(or right) are reserved       >>> for turning actions. Some are lined-mostly short dashes,       >>> through the turn, most are not marked.       >>       >>> How exactly does one navigate these without p/o'ing fellow       >>> drivers, and how do you handle the occasional       >>> "mid-turn-lane-changer"?       >>       >>       >>       >> General rule is turn into the lane that corresponds to the lane you       >> are coming form       >>       >>       >>       >> "mid-turn-lane-changer" is violating the law - shoot him :)       >>       >>       >>       >> Harry K       > ______________________       >       >       > LOL!       >       > Yeah, in most cases around where I live, if there are two turn lanes       > at an intersection there are two corresponding lanes on the road they       > turn onto.       >       > If I'm in front in an outside left-turn lane, I'll usually just gun       > into the left turn to prevent the inside-left-turner from trying to       > come over(which I've experienced too many times).       >       > Multiple rights(as I posted)? Rarer than hen's teeth at least in my       > neck.       >       > If I'm a car or two behind the leader in the outside left, I'll       > usually follow the car in front of me verrrry close - as in, cannot       > even see his license plate close! - so that the suitcases in the       > inside-left can't sneak over even if they tried. :)              Odd, the usual multiple-left-turn failures that I see (and we have a lot       of double left turn lanes around here, so this is sadly common) are from       a driver in either lane simply turning in too early. Either the guy in       the outside lane will pinch the guy in the inside lane, or the guy in       the inside lane will realize when he's most of the way through his turn       that he needs to slow and turn more sharply or else run wide into the       right lane on the cross street.              The "right way" to do it is to visualize a quarter circle arc from the       lane you're in to the lane you're going to end up in (leftmost lane if       you're in the inside lane, next one to the right for the outside lane)       ending at wherever the "intersection" turns into just plain old "road."        If you draw it out on paper you will see that that means possibly       going perfectly straight across a couple lanes of cross traffic that's       going from your left to right - but try following that line, or if       you're familiar with racing lines and apexes etc. modify it slightly,       just remember that early apexing will kill you not only on the track but       when making slow speed turns on the street. I never pinch the guy in       the inside lane, and (if I do it right) I never have to slow and make a       correction to keep from running wide. I'm on the power and down the       road while the guy that turned in early is behind me :) And there's       nothing that pisses off the average driver more than seeing the guy       who's apparently driving slowly (but smoothly) somehow magically end up       in front of him!              I tend to just stick with the quarter circle line and stay in the middle       of my imaginary "lane" - using a more racing type line I'd end up going       out-in-out and more often than not another driver's trying to occupy       part of my "lane" anyway so it's not worth the potential risk to get my       exit speed up by some fraction of a MPH.              Now, the question is, how do you convince other people that this is the       right way to do it, even though you know deep down inside that it       actually works and works well? *shrug* set a good example I guess and       drive well consistently. Doesn't really work, but it's the best idea I       have. (oh, and if someone actually *asks* explain it to them, but that       is vanishingly rare.)              When this *doesn't* work is the rare case that the road you're on has       the same number of lanes but is substantially wider than the road you're       turning onto - because the road you're on has a wider median, or has       turn lanes where the road you're turning onto doesn't - in that case you       may have to deviate from the "ideal" line to keep from interfering with       oncoming left turning traffic, turn in a little earlier and make a       shallower turn with a sharper correction at the end.              Then, of course, you have the morons that just turn into the wrong lane       altogether... or the guy RTORing onto a 3+ lane street while you have a       left turn arrow that gets all flustered because he can't figure out that       he needs to stay in the right lane and then change to the left once he's       out of the intersection area, and can't just turn into any damn lane he       wants...              nate              --       replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.       http://members.cox.net/njnagel              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca