From: tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com   
      
   On 2013-12-06, Dave Head  wrote:   
   > On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:06:27 +0000 (UTC), Brent   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >>On 2013-12-03, Dave Head  wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2013 07:22:08 -0800, "Daniel W. Rouse Jr."   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>I state that slower traffic should keep one lane to the left of the right   
   >>>>lane on any road with three or more lanes in one direction.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>The reasons are because the rightmost lane often becomes exit only or there   
   >>>>is a lane reduction closing the right lane anyway. Then slower traffic has   
   >>>>to merge into faster traffic anyway.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Discuss.   
   >>>   
   >>> This is the "correct", although maybe not strictly legal to drive   
   >>> these roads.   
   >>   
   >>it's not. It's typical american patch to treat symptoms of other   
   >>problems and thus creating more problems.   
   >>   
   >>> Keeping totally to the right, this stuff happens:   
   >>>   
   >>> 1) Everyone else that merges into traffic when entering such a roadway   
   >>> does so at 45 mph.  You either have to brake, or move left anyway.   
   >>   
   >>They shouldn't be doing that. Fix this problem instead of creating   
   >>another.   
      
   > Yep.  But the only thing I have the power to do is to not get killed   
   > by it.   The way to do that is to not be there - IOW, be a lane   
   > over...   
      
   That doesn't make it the correct way to drive, in quotes or not.   
   Furthermore there are other ways to deal with it. They are lazy drivers,   
   they only push as far as others will cater to them more times than not.   
      
   >>> 2) If you want to move left, there  is always some moron that has   
   >>> caught up to you and slowed down so as to occupy your blind spot   
   >>> forever.  Eventually you are going to miss one of them and then not   
   >>> "miss" them, and you are all going to end up into a frappin' light   
   >>> pole...   
      
   >>Again, another problem that should be dealt with instead of patched   
   >>over.   
      
   > I deal with it in the only manner I have power to.   
      
   You could set your mirrors properly.   
      
   >>> The right lane is for merging onto and exiting from a 3-or-more lanes   
   >>> wide expressway, no matter what the (antiquated) laws say.   
      
   >>No it's not for "merging and exiting". It's for driving.   
      
   > Nope, not any more...   
      
   I drive in the right lane much of the time.   
      
   >>>  Driving is about survival, not obeying laws.   
      
   >>In north america it's about laziness.   
      
   > You go ahead and moralize all the way to the horizon, and I'll drive   
   > to survive.   
      
   You're the one moralizing your own form of lazy driving.   
      
   >>One lazy driver after the other   
   >>creating an unworkable situation as they all try to pass the required   
   >>effort of the task on to others. The merger expects others to avoid so   
   >>he passes the work on to the drivers in the right lane. The drivers in   
   >>the right lane don't want to do it so they cruise one lane further left   
   >>passing on the effort to faster traffic.... just passing the buck,   
   >>kicking the can... laziness.  And people wonder why there is so much   
   >>traffic congestion.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)