From: nospam@nospam.invalid   
      
   In article <1eef33ee-5adb-4f13-b1a0-6801c76887c5@googlegroups.com>,   
   Harry K  wrote:   
      
   > > So why not make this simple and get rid of all laws that define   
   > > victimless crimes such as using a hand held GPS while driving, Simply   
   > > put, if a particular driver ends up crashing an injuring or killing   
   > > someone, then charge him based on the results of the crash (property   
   > > damage, injury, death, etc.).  I don't care whether he was drunk,   
   > > reaching for something on the passenger floor, using a hand held GPS,   
   > > fell asleep or whatever else might of happened.  If he ends up killing   
   > > someone in a crash, then charge him with vehicular manslaughter.   
   >   
   > Becauise bans on handheld and toys with screens are aimed at REDUCING the   
   > number of crashes caused by stupid bahaviour.  Is it working?  Dunno but by   
   > the people who don't want their right to be stupid curtailed I doubt it.   
   >   
   > You can't cure stupid.   
      
   true, you can't, so why inconvenience those who aren't stupid and use   
   technology in a safe manner by restricting devices that make their trip   
   easier and safer?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)