XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android   
   From: jollyroger@pobox.com   
      
   On 2014-02-28, Arif Khokar  wrote:   
   > On 02/28/2014 11:58 AM, Jolly Roger wrote:   
   >   
   >>> So why not make this simple and get rid of all laws that define   
   >>> victimless crimes such as using a hand held GPS while driving, Simply   
   >>> put, if a particular driver ends up crashing an injuring or killing   
   >>> someone, then charge him based on the results of the crash (property   
   >>> damage, injury, death, etc.).  I don't care whether he was drunk,   
   >>> reaching for something on the passenger floor, using a hand held GPS,   
   >>> fell asleep or whatever else might of happened.  If he ends up killing   
   >>> someone in a crash, then charge him with vehicular manslaughter.   
   >>   
   >> So your solution is to change nothing. Got it.   
   >   
   > Could you form a logical argument that demonstrates that getting rid of   
   > all laws that define victimless crimes is equivalent of changing nothing?   
      
   It was sarcasm. Deal with it.   
      
   --   
   E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.   
   I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.   
      
   JR   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)