Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,459 of 162,178    |
|    Liam O'Connor to nospam    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    28 Feb 14 16:41:07    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:03:10 -0500, nospam wrote:              > other reasons include better safety requirements in cars, better roads,       > including impact absorbing barriers, and much more.              Just to be clear, I knew that but I was keeping on the       topic of the cellphone.              But, I do agree that a primary factor was seatbelts, which       started to be ubiquitous in the 70s or so, and then the       crash test worthiness factors helped a lot (e.g., airbags).              At some point, the 55mph speed limit helped.              Also the impact-absorbing and breakaway barriers helped,       as did better lighting (remember when Halogen came out?)       and electronic stabillity control (e.g., ABS & DSC).              Other than the electronic systems, I'm not sure what       has occurred in the past 5 years though, other than       a cellphone in a car is a safer car than without.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca