Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,465 of 162,178    |
|    Liam O'Connor to nospam    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    28 Feb 14 17:04:02    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:03:14 -0500, nospam wrote:              > 1.3 million crashes may sound like a lot, but out of over 4 trillion       > passenger miles (2011 numbers), it's rather low.              I don't disagree with you (nospam) that the numbers quoted,       while astoundingly high, must be taken with a grain of salt.              However, if they're true ... meaningfully true that is, then       that would be a game changer.              What I'd like to see is this huge jump in traffic accidents,       not just accidents where a cell phone was found to be in the       vehicle (or in use at the time).              If, as the statistic quoted suggests, cell phone use is a       large contributor to accidents, then we should see a correspondingly       large additional number of accidents.              I do not know if that is the case, but, certainly deaths and       injuries are lowering. But what I'd like to see is the number       of accidents before cell phones versus the number of accidents       after cell phones.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca