home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.driving      Automobile discussion (general)      162,179 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 160,467 of 162,179   
   Liam O'Connor to Jolly Roger   
   Re: Finally, California drivers can read   
   28 Feb 14 17:18:32   
   
   XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android   
   From: liamoconnor@example.com   
      
   On 28 Feb 2014 19:52:48 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:   
      
   > And I'm supposed to just take your word for that statistic?   
      
   Just to be clear, I said "I don't know" in the same sentence that   
   I said that the issue is in the numbers, and I took a swag at   
   the numbers.   
      
   I prefer to look at "accidents" and "deaths/injuries" (which   
   aren't necessarily correlated, so, I think "accidents" is more   
   likely the metric we need to look at).   
      
   If cell phone use is inherently dangerous, and if we all agree   
   that cell phone use didn't exist before a certain time period,   
   and if nothing else of major import changed too greatly, then   
   we should, I would think, see a correspondingly huge increase   
   in the number of accidents that correlates with increased   
   cell phone use.   
      
   Do we see more ACCIDENTS in the statistics after cell phones   
   became ubiquitous? If not, we can't assume cellphones are   
   adding to the danger, no matter how they're used in the car.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca