Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,179 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,468 of 162,179    |
|    Liam O'Connor to nospam    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    28 Feb 14 17:14:16    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:03:02 -0500, nospam wrote:              > exceeding the speed limit is not in itself dangerous.              I must agree.              If a Ford Pinto and a BMW 750i were to be neck and neck       along a four-lane highway, and a deer unexpectedly       dashed in front of them, at any highway speed, I would       expect the BMW to be the "safer" car (drivers equalized).              I always tell my kids, when we hear "speed kills", that       it's an idiot's argument. Speed doesn't kill; otherwise       simply going 75 miles an hour would kill more people.              Going too fast for the vehicle to be kept under control       when something unexpected happens, and not anticipating       that unexpected event (e.g., going around a blind curve)       is VASTLY more dangerous (it seems to me) than speed alone.              But, law enforcement, being what it is, has nothing else       to go by other than speed (I don't doubt that going 130mph       on a 25mph road is a prescription for disaster - but it's       reckless driving that actually is the major contributory       factor).              But I digress from the iPad cellphone issue ...              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca