home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.driving      Automobile discussion (general)      162,178 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 160,483 of 162,178   
   Brent to arvimide@earthlink.net   
   Re: Finally, California drivers can read   
   01 Mar 14 02:58:37   
   
   XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android   
   From: tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com   
      
   On 2014-03-01, AV3  wrote:   
   > On Feb/28/2014 5:0953 PM, nospam wrote:   
   >> In article<280220141427420841%michelle@michelle.org>, Michelle Steiner   
   >>   wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> ...   
   >>   
   >> that's just fucked up.   
   >>   
   >>> (Convicted sex offenders have to renew annually; I read that when I was   
   >>> reading about the renewal periods.)   
   >>   
   >> is there a correlation between sex offenders and bad driving?   
   >>   
   >> is that somehow supposed to prevent future sex crimes?   
   >>   
   >> if they want to track the person's location, there are more effective   
   >> ways.   
   >   
   >   
   > In fact the driver's license is an identity card, containing the   
   > holder's birth date, address, head shot, and other generally useful   
   > information. There has always been great resistance to issuing an   
   > internal passport/identity card in the U. S., because it is regarded as   
   > the control instrument of a police state, as Soviet Russia used its   
   > internal passports to rigidly control the movement and activities of its   
   > citizens. So the driver's license serves the purpose, and New York State   
   > issues an identity card on demand to non-drivers.   
   >   
   >   
   > If the U. S. wanted to confine driver's licenses to use purely for   
   > purposes of driving, and social security cards purely for collecting   
   > pension benefits, there would have to be an internal passport, which   
   > would beaurocratically duplicate the information already in most   
   > people's pockets.   
      
   Americans want freedom in name only. They accept all the pieces of   
   tyrannies if they are just renamed and have the right excuses.   
      
   But there is a bit of a way around things. A passport works for most   
   internal purposes and contains less information. At least the printed   
   portion does, not sure what's in the RFID part.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca