Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,179 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,492 of 162,179    |
|    Liam O'Connor to Your Name    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    28 Feb 14 19:24:28    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.android, comp.mobile.ipad       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 15:52:17 +1300, Your Name wrote:              > Cellphone use while driving is DEFINITELY causing SOME accidents.       > There's no question about it. Whether or not it's some massive increase       > isn't really relevant, and any way to decrease the number of accidents       > is a good thing - if that means adding another law to the list of       > things you can't do while driving, then so be it.              I respect your opinion and I understand your point.              Your point, paraphrased, is that a distracted driver can cause       an accident, which would not otherwise have occurred had that       driver not been distracted.              My point is that we have had a massive increase in cellphone       use, from 0% to nearly 100% (YourName excepted) in only a few       years.              If cellphone use causes accidents, should't we see a correspondingly       *massive* increase in accidents?              Or, is it that only *some* people are distracted by cellphone       use, with the rest of us being just as prudent with as without?              It reminds me of the "baby on board" signs. It always seemed to me       that people with those signs were, in effect, saying "I have my       precious little poo poo in my car so YOU should drive more carefully       around me".              Whenever I see those signs, I think they should be tattooed on the       forehead of the person owning those babies, because THEY are the       ones who need to drive safely when precious little poo poo is in       the car.              The rest of us drive safely whether or not there is a baby in       the car in front of us.              Same argument for cell phones I think needs to be considered.              It seems that if the number of accidents hasn't risen massively       in the same time that cellphone use has risen massively, then a       perfectly logical conclusion is that some people will get into       accidents no matter what is in their hands.              If that's the case, how are you going to legistlate that?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca