Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,179 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,511 of 162,179    |
|    Liam O'Connor to Your Name    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    28 Feb 14 20:07:24    |
      XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 16:52:41 +1300, Your Name wrote:              > Whether any individual person can see, know, understand (or want to       > understand) the reasons isn't really relevant.              I understood your point, which was the same as mine, in most       respects.              What you said is that they wanted to discourage use of the       side streets, and they did so with speed limit signs which       lowered the speed, therefore, you assumed, which made it       safer.              I don't disagree.              But, what about those big red STOP signs on culdesacs with       only a few houses on them?              BTW, I should prove this with pictures, but I donm't have them       at the moment - but we should open a separate thread on that       because it's an abuse by the government of the STOP sign purpose.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca