Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,179 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,588 of 162,179    |
|    Liam O'Connor to Your Name    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    01 Mar 14 21:22:37    |
      ebd4551b       XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 14:58:51 +1300, Your Name wrote:              > You can "request" all you like, but one's person's silly opinion isn't       > going to make the slightest bit of difference              You guys have a good point in that I should request a copy of       the traffic study that validated that the traffic (which must       be as high as 6,000 "units" per day on the main street) study       validated the requirements of the NHTSA.              I'm pretty sure that there is no way these stop signs meet       the requirements - but - as you noted, if they will provide       the proof, I should ask.              Of course, that's a lot more work than just disrespecting the       law by not stopping. Note that it's not at all a safety issue,       as I *would* stop if a cop were there (unless I let them know       ahead of time, to make the point) or if there were a pedestrian       expecting me to stop.              I do *not* stop if an opposing vehicle expects me to stop,       but I would stop, out of an abundance of caution, if there       were, perchance, a vehicle entering the main road from the       side culdesac.              Of course, in practice, *that* never happens simply becuase       there is no traffic to speak of on that side road.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca