XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android   
   From: g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies   
      
   In message <020320141014124119%YourName@YourISP.com>   
     Your Name  wrote:   
   > In article   
   > , Liam   
   > O'Connor  wrote:   
      
   >> On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:29:29 +1300, Your Name wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > The study sample sizes are way too small, they simply ignore *MANY,   
   >> > MANY* other potential factors, and (especially in the case of medical   
   >> > studies) run for far too short a timeframe.   
   >>   
   >> While the studies are likely flawed, if it is true that traffic   
   >> accidents haven't risen concomittently with cell phone use, how   
   >> can anyone conclude that the use of cell phones causes accidents?   
      
   > Again, there's far too many conflicting factors to actually prove that   
   > either way, and enforcing one less distraction for drivers is the   
   > better option.   
      
   I saw start with talk radio; I'm sure that causes far more accidents   
   that talking on a cellphone.   
      
   Then, ban passengers, especially those under 12. Again, far more   
   distracting.   
      
   Also, ban eating or drinking anything 6 hours before driving, the   
   pressing need for a restroom is at least 1000x more distracting than   
   talking on your mobile.   
      
   --   
   I find Windows of absolutely no technical interest... Mac OS X is a rock   
   -solid system that's beautifully designed. I much prefer it to Linux. -- Bill   
   Joy   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)