Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,599 of 162,178    |
|    Liam O'Connor to Your Name    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    01 Mar 14 22:30:16    |
      86b13045       XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 10:14:12 +1300, Your Name wrote:              > Again, there's far too many conflicting factors to actually prove that       > either way, and enforcing one less distraction for drivers is the       > better option.              That's a funny argument, but, I guess it shows the difference       personality has on how people formulate logic.              If I may attempt to paraphrase what you said in that one quoted       paragraph, it's this:        "We don't have proof either way that cellphone use causes        accidents, but it might, so let's outlaw it."              My personality is such that my interpretation of the same data       would be something like the following:        "We don't have proof either way that cellphone use causes        accidents, so let's not outlaw it until/unless we do."              ---       "Well, they just *might* possibly have WMDs, so let's attack."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca