XPost: comp.mobile.android, comp.mobile.ipad   
   From: nospam@nospam.invalid   
      
   In article , Jolly Roger   
    wrote:   
      
   > >>> People who aren't able to see beyond "the law is the law, obey the law"   
   > >>> (no matter how idiotic it is), are ones who never grew out of the   
   > >>> adolescent level of thinking (which is concrete operational stage as   
   > >>> termed by Piaget)   
   > >>   
   > >> Thankfully only a small minority "of people participating in this   
   > >> thread" are selfish, ignorant morons who don't believe laws should   
   > >> apply to them ... it's these idiotic imbeciles that end up killing   
   > >> themselves and/or unforunately (and more likely) some other innocent   
   > >> person.  :-(   
   > >   
   > > In the scenario described earlier in the thread, that will never happen   
   > > because the volume of traffic is far too low for it to be a realistic   
   > > possibility.   
   >   
   > So you are perfectly willing to accept that based on some random dude on   
   > the internet's word for it, but at the same time refuse to accept that   
   > authorities may have had a good reason for putting the sign there to   
   > begin with. Got it.   
      
   and authorities always do the correct thing. got it.   
      
   based on what he's posted so far, the stop sign is likely in violation   
   of mutcd, which means it should not be there.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)