home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.driving      Automobile discussion (general)      162,178 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 160,689 of 162,178   
   Your Name to alangbaker@telus.net   
   Re: Finally, California drivers can read   
   05 Mar 14 18:15:39   
   
   XPost: comp.mobile.android, comp.mobile.ipad   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article , Alan Baker   
    wrote:   
   > On 2014-03-05 01:40:26 +0000, Savageduck said:   
   > > On 2014-03-04 23:40:55 +0000, Liam O'Connor  said:   
   > >> On Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:02:07 +1300, Your Name wrote:   
   > >>>   
   > >>> ignoring a law simply because you don't like it or   
   > >>> understand it is idiotically and moronically stupid, and in the case of   
   > >>> driving laws, damn dangerous to you and other people on and near the   
   > >>> roads.   
   > >>   
   > >> It's our duty to disrespect laws that are unlawful in the first   
   > >> place. That's a principle our entire country was founded upon.   
   > >   
   > > Wrong.   
   > >   
   > >> However, it's also our duty to work to CHANGE the laws which   
   > >> are illegal. There are, it appears, based on the advice kindly   
   > >> provided here, multiple ways to accomplish that.   
   > >   
   > > They are law therefore they are by definition, legal. That does not   
   > > mean they cannot be questioned, impeached, overturned, or changed.   
   >   
   > If a law is overturned, that means it was never legal in the first place.   
      
   Not necessarily. It may simply mean that the law is no longer valid for   
   whatever reason, not that it wasn't valid at the time it was actually   
   first made.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca