Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,718 of 162,178    |
|    Liam O'Connor to Your Name    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    08 Mar 14 12:26:45    |
      ca0f3a2b       XPost: comp.mobile.android, comp.mobile.ipad       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 18:14:32 +1300, Your Name wrote:              > The damn things aren't that cheap, so they don't go around just       > sticking one wherever they feel like it. There *IS* a reason - if you       > want to know what it is, then go and ask the people in charge of       > putting it there.              I agree with you but disagree with you a tiny bit.       a. There is certainly a "reason", I agree.       b. The signs are not cheaper than the "correct" approach.              The town traffic engineer already spoke to me about this.       He didn't know the "reason"; but he knew the facts of the case.       He also told me that, today, they'd use "quieting" methods.              The traffic engineer told me that, in the 90s, the neighborhood       was given a "survey" and that the town council voted to approve       the stop signs. We also know that no engineering study was ever       performed. We also can assume, based on our intimate knowledge of       that intersection, that, IMHO, there's absolutely no way that       a traffic study could possibly warrant the signs being there.              We are left to guess as to the "reason", but, like all political       corruption, this seems clear to me as merely the illegal       application of the wrong law for the wrong purpose.              Had they performed traffic quieting procedures, it would have       likely cost FAR more than putting up two signs (e.g., speed       bumps, enforcement overtime, artificial medians, artificial       striping, etc.).              In other words, the wrong approach was far cheaper than the       correct approach.              And, the only reason the wrong approach works, is that most       people are, IMHO, mindless sheep who wouldn't know a legally       emplaced STOP sign from an illegally emplaced one if it hit       them on the head.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca