fcd6015c   
   XPost: misc.legal, ca.driving, ba.transportation   
   From: liamoconnor@example.com   
      
   On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 08:28:13 -0500, David L. Martel wrote:   
      
   >  I don't find "it's illegal" to be a very credible argument.   
      
   This was good advice, from someone who knows.   
   So I appreciate your time, David.   
      
   I must admit, to you anyway, that my real reason is that   
   these signs *are* illegally placed. They erode trust in   
   government. And, they deserve no respect. Nor, since they   
   don't serve the purpose for which they were intended, are   
   they the correct implement of traffic control.   
      
   Moreso, there have been plenty of changes on those streets   
   since the 1990s, e.g., Hamilton has had a concrete barrier   
   emplaced, a traffic light was installed at Llewellyn and   
   Hamilton, the roads were widenened, turn lanes were added,   
   etc..   
      
   So, I might have to approach it as that they're no longer   
   "needed". Do you think that would be a good approach?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)