47f554ac   
   XPost: misc.legal, ca.driving, ba.transportation   
   From: liamoconnor@example.com   
      
   On Sun, 9 Mar 2014 10:05:24 -0400, David L. Martel wrote:   
      
   > I'd look into how you can demonstrate that they are   
   > "no longer needed". So you'll need a traffic study.   
      
   Hi David,   
   I don't disagree with you that the approach they are "no longer   
   needed" seems reasonable.   
      
   We already know that no traffic study was performed.   
   And, we know that the basic traffic control in the area has changed.   
   Therefore, it does seem reasonable to "request" a traffic study.   
      
   > Understand that if the data supports the signs, you won't   
   > get them removed, barring serious graft and corruption.   
      
   There is absolutely no way a traffic study could possibly   
   warrant those multi-way stop signs. Even the traffic engineer   
   nominally agreed with me, in my personal conversation with him,   
   over the phone.   
      
   So that's the least of my worries. :)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)