Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,179 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 160,808 of 162,179    |
|    Liam O'Connor to Your Name    |
|    Re: Finally, California drivers can read    |
|    11 Mar 14 13:04:27    |
      fb5b0a22       XPost: comp.mobile.ipad, comp.mobile.android       From: liamoconnor@example.com              On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:02:42 +1300, Your Name wrote:              > The only way a Stop sign does not control speed is when selfish morons       > ignore it. Normal intelligent people, *slow down* and *stop* ... hence       > it does control their speed.              I have to (for once) agree with you that STOP signs, whether       there for safety or speed reasons, must, in effect, slow       down the traffic.              At least they must be slowing down the traffic directly       leading up to and directly following the stop sign.              Whether they slow down the traffic on a longer stretch of       road would be debatable.              In the case I proposed, the entire Llewellyn section is only       about 1,000 feet long, with two multi-way stop signs about       100 feet apart, roughly in the middle.              So, that would, I would agree, tend to slow down overall       traffic which can visually see the road in its entirety       so they would know that there is a Tbone stop at both       ends .              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca