XPost: comp.mobile.android, comp.mobile.ipad   
   From: tetraethylleadREMOVETHIS@yahoo.com   
      
   On 2014-03-11, Your Name wrote:   
   > In article , Brent   
   > wrote:   
   >> On 2014-03-11, Jolly Roger wrote:   
   >> > On 2014-03-11, Brent wrote:   
   >> >> On 2014-03-11, Jolly Roger wrote:   
   >> >>> On 2014-03-11, Lewis wrote:   
   >> >>>>   
   >> >>>> If you drive 55mph where the flow of traffic is 70mph then *you* are   
   >> >>>> a hazard. Many of those idiots you see are trying to avoid an   
   >> >>>> un-anticipated impediment.   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> Depends very much on the circumstance. What if the speed limit is 55?   
   >> >>> What if there are multiple flows of traffic - some obeying the speed   
   >> >>> limit, and others not? Very often, I'll be driving with cruise   
   >> >>> control set to 55-60 in the middle lane of a 3-lane highway where the   
   >> >>> posted speed limit is 55, where most of the cars around me are doing   
   >> >>> similar speeds (again, around 55-60), and a group of cars (usually   
   >> >>> anywhere from 2 to 6 cars) will come up from behind driving   
   >> >>> significantly faster than 55 (sometimes 15-25 miles faster (yes:   
   >> >>> 75-85 mph in a 55), speeding much faster than the traffic around me),   
   >> >>> usually with one or two idiots leading the pack in some sort of   
   >> >>> apparent race to see who can get wherever faster. Inevitably one or   
   >> >>> more drivers in the speeding group gets upset that the drivers in my   
   >> >>> group are "in their way", usually in various lanes (almost never just   
   >> >>> the left lane), and start tailgating and using aggressive and fast   
   >> >>> lane switching maneuvers in all three lanes, often making   
   >> >>> double-lane-switches without signalling within a few feet of other   
   >> >>> cars and pulling other dangerous stunts to get past these "slow"   
   >> >>> drivers that are imposing such an inconvenience on their little   
   >> >>> racing game as quickly as possible, safety be damned. In such a   
   >> >>> situation, I'd typically like to gradually decrease my speed, and   
   >> >>> make safe lane changes to the right to get as far away from the   
   >> >>> idiots as possible, if and when such opportunities safely become   
   >> >>> available. Unfortunately, very often, due to the tailgating   
   >> >>> aggressive behavior of the speeding group, there isn't a good   
   >> >>> opportunity to do that until *after* they've finished making their   
   >> >>> dangerous maneuvers and sped on past. I'm probably one of the last   
   >> >>> people who will just gleefully increase my speed to match the speed   
   >> >>> of the idiot group when I see them coming in my rear view mirror -   
   >> >>> especially if I'm not in the passing lane and I'm already at or   
   >> >>> exceeding the posted limit, and the cars around me are doing the same   
   >> >>> speed as me. Nor am I going to quickly or dangerously make lane   
   >> >>> changes just to get out of their way to make their dangerous behavior   
   >> >>> easier for them to continue. Safety comes first, and I naturally   
   >> >>> value the safety of the well-behaved drivers around me more than   
   >> >>> speeding jackasses. BTW, this isn't a cherry-picked example situation   
   >> >>> - it happens *all* *the* *time* on American highways.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> What happens on grossly underposted limited access highways is that   
   >> >> drivers like Jolly here form packs that impede flow.   
   >> >   
   >> > I'd like to understand your logic better. Are you suggesting that every   
   >> > 55 MPH highway in America us grossly under posted, or just the ones on   
   >> > which I personally travel? Are you suggesting that those exceeding   
   >> > posted speed limits do not form packs? Also, how do you know the road   
   >> > conditions of the highways I typically travel? Are you secretly   
   >> > following me, or do you have telepathy and know which highways I travel?   
   >> > Please explain.   
   >>   
   >> Your opinion of the PSL is irrelevant. You unwittingly described the   
   >> conditions of a grossly underposted limited access highway. The   
   >> condition you describe does not happen where the road and PSL match   
   >> well.   
   >>   
   >> >> Faster drivers then go from pack to pack, neededing to find a way   
   >> >> through each pack, often doing a Claybrook weave.   
   >>   
   >> > So the dangerous behavior I describe above is necessary in your view?   
   >> > Strange. Do you prioritize speed over safety?   
   >>   
   >> Seems in your opinion dangerous is going faster than you.   
      
   > Speed limit signs are not a "target" to get to nor a exact figure you   
   > must drive at. The signs are advising the MAXIMUM speed in IDEAL   
   > CONDITIONS, but various factors means driving slower than that may   
   > indeed be safer.   
      
   LOL! Speed limits on limited access highways are largely determined by   
   social/political opinion and revenue desires.   
      
   For instance, I-294 in Illinois is posted at 55mph. In good weather at   
   the right time of day in appropiate sections in capable car I estimate   
   that the maximum safe speed is somewhere around 120mph or more.   
      
   >> >> When 55mph was imposed Claybrook stated it   
   >> >> was safer to force faster drivers to slow down and weave through   
   >> >> blockages of slow drivers who can't be bothered to keep right except to   
   >> >> pass.   
   >>   
   >> > Experience shows it is the idiots described above who can't be bothered   
   >> > to keep right. They stay firmly implanted in the left lane, expecting   
   >> > every other drive on the fucking planet to get out of their way,   
   >> > regardless of posted speed limits or safety implications.   
   >>   
   >> Wasn't it you that was complaining earlier they passed on the right?   
      
   >> Anyway, keep right except to pass. You shouldn't have to get out of   
   >> their way because you shouldn't have been in their way in the first   
   >> place.   
      
   > In some places it's necessary to be in the "wrong" lane because that's   
   > the one you need for the exit or continuation of your jopurney. Trying   
   > to shove your way into the lane at the last minute is stupid.   
      
   Special cases are few and far between, a tiny tiny fraction of the miles   
   of highway.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|