XPost: comp.mobile.android, comp.mobile.ipad   
   From: YourName@YourISP.com   
      
   In article , Brent   
    wrote:   
      
   > On 2014-03-11, Your Name wrote:   
   > > In article , Brent   
   > >>   
   > >> Seems in your opinion dangerous is going faster than you.   
   > >   
   > > Speed limit signs are not a "target" to get to nor a exact figure you   
   > > must drive at. The signs are advising the MAXIMUM speed in IDEAL   
   > > CONDITIONS, but various factors means driving slower than that may   
   > > indeed be safer.   
   >   
   > LOL! Speed limits on limited access highways are largely determined by   
   > social/political opinion and revenue desires.   
   >   
   > For instance, I-294 in Illinois is posted at 55mph. In good weather at   
   > the right time of day in appropiate sections in capable car I estimate   
   > that the maximum safe speed is somewhere around 120mph or more.   
      
   As with the idiot whinign about Stop signs, there wil be a reason for   
   that speed limit ... whether you understand that reason or not is   
   complete ly irrelevant.   
      
      
      
      
   > >> >> When 55mph was imposed Claybrook stated it   
   > >> >> was safer to force faster drivers to slow down and weave through   
   > >> >> blockages of slow drivers who can't be bothered to keep right except to   
   > >> >> pass.   
   > >>   
   > >> > Experience shows it is the idiots described above who can't be bothered   
   > >> > to keep right. They stay firmly implanted in the left lane, expecting   
   > >> > every other drive on the fucking planet to get out of their way,   
   > >> > regardless of posted speed limits or safety implications.   
   > >>   
   > >> Wasn't it you that was complaining earlier they passed on the right?   
   >   
   > >> Anyway, keep right except to pass. You shouldn't have to get out of   
   > >> their way because you shouldn't have been in their way in the first   
   > >> place.   
   >   
   > > In some places it's necessary to be in the "wrong" lane because that's   
   > > the one you need for the exit or continuation of your journey. Trying   
   > > to shove your way into the lane at the last minute is stupid.   
   >   
   > Special cases are few and far between, a tiny tiny fraction of the miles   
   > of highway.   
      
   I said "some places". There's also a variety of other reasons for   
   perhaps not moving over to the "slower" lanes ... including all the   
   impatient morons zooming up behind you, changing lanes and passing you   
   on the "wrong side".   
      
   It's like the idiots who write in to the newspaper here in New Zealand.   
   They whine on about how "slow" drivers are blocking them on the winding   
   country road, and when they get to a strecth of road which has an extr   
   a"passing lane", the "slow" drivers speed up ... well, duh! The passing   
   lanes are in places where it's safe to put them and means the road is   
   wider, so that means it's safer to go faster.   
      
   Of course what these morons never understand is that even thought they   
   zoom past and think they're so clever, the "slow" driver often passes   
   them at the next traffic lights, or when speedy has stoppped at the   
   petrol station, etc. Speeding doesn't achieve anything, except prove   
   how idiotically stupid and juvenille you are.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|