home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.driving      Automobile discussion (general)      162,178 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 160,967 of 162,178   
   T0m $herman to Jolly Roger   
   Re: Finally, California drivers can read   
   15 Mar 14 21:38:45   
   
   XPost: comp.mobile.android, comp.mobile.ipad   
   From: twsherman@REMOVE_THISsouthslope.net   
      
   On 3/15/2014 5:46 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:   
   > On 2014-03-15, T0m $herman  wrote:   
   >> On 3/12/2014 12:53 AM, Your Name wrote:   
   >>> I said "some places". There's also a variety of other reasons for   
   >>> perhaps not moving over to the "slower" lanes ... including all the   
   >>> impatient morons zooming up behind you, changing lanes and passing you   
   >>> on the "wrong side".   
   >>   
   >> Your paragraph makes no sense.  Staying in the right lane (left lane for   
   >> most of the Commonwealth and Japan) means the faster traffic will   
   >> naturally overtake on the correct side.  Works in Northern Europe, where   
   >> the police *will* ticket you for blocking the inside lane.   
   >   
   > That makes perfect sense for two-lane roads. Are all of the highways you   
   > drive two-lane roads? Around these parts, we can have many more than   
   > just two lanes. Or do you expect all drivers to remain in the right-most   
   > lane even when there are 3, 4, or 5 lanes available, just so that the   
   > Fast & Furious can have the road all to themselves?   
   >   
   >   
   Yes I do, and yes I did when I commuted regularly on 6 and 8-lane   
   controlled access roads.   
      
   --   
   T0m $herm@n   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca