XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: alt.politics.usa.constitution, misc.legal   
   From: evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid   
      
   On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:46:24 -0400, richard    
   wrote:   
      
   >(A) No person, without privilege to do so and with purpose to prevent,   
   >obstruct, or delay the performance by a public official of any authorized   
   >act within the public official's official capacity, shall do any act that   
   >hampers or impedes a public official in the performance of the public   
   >official's lawful duties.   
   >   
   >(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of obstructing official   
   >business. Except as otherwise provided in this division, obstructing   
   >official business is a misdemeanor of the second degree. If a violation of   
   >this section creates a risk of physical harm to any person, obstructing   
   >official business is a felony of the fifth degree.   
   >   
   >   
   >And I just noted a misprint here. That is NOT my doing.   
   >http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2921.31   
   >   
   >The proper wording should be, ".... shall NOT do any....".   
   >If the judge took this law as it is written, he'd have to rule the guy was   
   >innocent as he was complying with the law.   
   >   
   >   
   >Now what physical harm to persons was there in this case?   
   >So what if the camera is five feet off the ground or 500 feet.   
   >   
   >IMO, if this case goes to appeals, it will probably get dismissed.   
   >But strange things happen with laws in Ohio.   
      
   Umm wow, bullis. That's a new one, even for you.   
      
   Reading comprehension fail.   
   --   
   To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)