home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.autos.driving      Automobile discussion (general)      162,178 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 161,260 of 162,178   
   Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Phi to Alan Baker   
   Re: Daylight Running Lights   
   15 Dec 14 12:45:58   
   
   From: thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com   
      
   On Monday, December 15, 2014 1:28:42 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > On 2014-12-15 16:36:17 +0000, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher   
   said:   
   >   
   > > On Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:57:04 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >> On 2014-12-14 23:51:26 +0000, thekmanrocks@gmail.com said:   
   > >>   
   > >>> Alan Baker wrote: "A lot of things were "fine" until we found a better>   
   > >>> > way, you know.   That's a pretty common truth"   
   > >>>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Even in the cases of progress for the sake of progress itself?  We'll>   
   > >>> > just have to respectfully disagree there.   
   > >>   
   > >> No. I didn't say that.   
   > >>   
   > >> But the argument, "Things were fine before X" is a pretty weak one at   
   best.   
   > >>   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Two things cars could do without:  DRLS(one less drain on the battery),   
   > >>   
   > >> Ummm... DRLs don't drain the battery... ...because they are used when>   
   > >> the car is running and the alternator produces more than enough power>   
   > >> to run them and keep the battery fully charged.   
   > >>   
   > >>> and power door locks(I don't like anything that automatically locks   
   itself).   
   > >>   
   > >> I kind of agree with this one. I don't particularly care for doors   
   > >> that> automatically lock myself.   
   > >   
   > > Unlike automatic locks and air bags, we should concentrate on   
   > > PREVENTION. How many airbags we have nowadays? They probably save your   
   > > life but the crippling injuries and the trauma will stay with you.   
   > >   
   > > It would be easy for NHTSA to go the same way of Europe and Canada, but   
   > > they couldn't care less. Never even heard of a campaign against   
   > > distracted driving or something. Oh yes, they do pick on the drunks,   
   > > but they are not the only ones threatening our communities. Speeders   
   > > are just as dangerous if not more.   
   >   
   >   
   > If you define speeding as "exceeding the posted limit" that's nonsense.   
      
   I'm all for "no limits" on certain roads where drivers have a special license,   
   the rules are clear and passing on the left is mandatory.   
      
   However speeding through communities must be controlled for these simple facts:   
      
   Every 2 hours a pedestrian dies in a traffic crash   
      
   Rate of survival at 20mph: 90% survive   
      
     "        "        45mph: 35% survive   
      
   source: AARP Bulletin Dec 2014   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca