Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 161,260 of 162,178    |
|    Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Phi to Alan Baker    |
|    Re: Daylight Running Lights    |
|    15 Dec 14 12:45:58    |
      From: thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com              On Monday, December 15, 2014 1:28:42 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > On 2014-12-15 16:36:17 +0000, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher       said:       >       > > On Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:57:04 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > >> On 2014-12-14 23:51:26 +0000, thekmanrocks@gmail.com said:       > >>       > >>> Alan Baker wrote: "A lot of things were "fine" until we found a better>       > >>> > way, you know. That's a pretty common truth"       > >>>       > >>>       > >>> Even in the cases of progress for the sake of progress itself? We'll>       > >>> > just have to respectfully disagree there.       > >>       > >> No. I didn't say that.       > >>       > >> But the argument, "Things were fine before X" is a pretty weak one at       best.       > >>       > >>>       > >>> Two things cars could do without: DRLS(one less drain on the battery),       > >>       > >> Ummm... DRLs don't drain the battery... ...because they are used when>       > >> the car is running and the alternator produces more than enough power>       > >> to run them and keep the battery fully charged.       > >>       > >>> and power door locks(I don't like anything that automatically locks       itself).       > >>       > >> I kind of agree with this one. I don't particularly care for doors       > >> that> automatically lock myself.       > >       > > Unlike automatic locks and air bags, we should concentrate on       > > PREVENTION. How many airbags we have nowadays? They probably save your       > > life but the crippling injuries and the trauma will stay with you.       > >       > > It would be easy for NHTSA to go the same way of Europe and Canada, but       > > they couldn't care less. Never even heard of a campaign against       > > distracted driving or something. Oh yes, they do pick on the drunks,       > > but they are not the only ones threatening our communities. Speeders       > > are just as dangerous if not more.       >       >       > If you define speeding as "exceeding the posted limit" that's nonsense.              I'm all for "no limits" on certain roads where drivers have a special license,       the rules are clear and passing on the left is mandatory.              However speeding through communities must be controlled for these simple facts:              Every 2 hours a pedestrian dies in a traffic crash              Rate of survival at 20mph: 90% survive               " " 45mph: 35% survive              source: AARP Bulletin Dec 2014              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca