Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 161,262 of 162,178    |
|    Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Phi to Alan Baker    |
|    Re: Daylight Running Lights    |
|    15 Dec 14 13:54:32    |
      From: thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com              On Monday, December 15, 2014 4:17:26 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > On 2014-12-15 21:02:12 +0000, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher       said:       >       > > On Monday, December 15, 2014 3:49:14 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > >> On 2014-12-15 20:45:58 +0000, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher       said:       > >>       > >>> On Monday, December 15, 2014 1:28:42 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > >>>> On 2014-12-15 16:36:17 +0000, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble       Philosopher said:       > >>>>       > >>>>> On Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:57:04 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > >>>>>> On 2014-12-14 23:51:26 +0000, thekmanrocks@gmail.com said:       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Alan Baker wrote: "A lot of things were "fine" until we found a       better>       > >>>>>>>> way, you know. That's a pretty common truth"       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Even in the cases of progress for the sake of progress itself?        We'll>       > >>>>>>>> just have to respectfully disagree there.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> No. I didn't say that.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> But the argument, "Things were fine before X" is a pretty weak one at       best.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>>       > >>>>>>> Two things cars could do without: DRLS(one less drain on the       battery),       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> Ummm... DRLs don't drain the battery... ...because they are used when>       > >>>>>> the car is running and the alternator produces more than enough power>       > >>>>>> to run them and keep the battery fully charged.       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>>> and power door locks(I don't like anything that automatically locks       itself).       > >>>>>>       > >>>>>> I kind of agree with this one. I don't particularly care for doors       > >>>>>> that> automatically lock myself.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> Unlike automatic locks and air bags, we should concentrate on       > >>>>> PREVENTION. How many airbags we have nowadays? They probably save your       > >>>>> life but the crippling injuries and the trauma will stay with you.       > >>>>>       > >>>>> It would be easy for NHTSA to go the same way of Europe and Canada, but       > >>>>> they couldn't care less. Never even heard of a campaign against       > >>>>> distracted driving or something. Oh yes, they do pick on the drunks,       > >>>>> but they are not the only ones threatening our communities. Speeders       > >>>>> are just as dangerous if not more.       > >>>>       > >>>>       > >>>> If you define speeding as "exceeding the posted limit" that's nonsense.       > >>>       > >>> I'm all for "no limits" on certain roads where drivers have a special       > >>> license, the rules are clear and passing on the left is mandatory.       > >>>       > >>> However speeding through communities must be controlled for these simple       facts:       > >>>       > >>> Every 2 hours a pedestrian dies in a traffic crash       > >>>       > >>> Rate of survival at 20mph: 90% survive       > >>>       > >>> " " 45mph: 35% survive       > >>>       > >>> source: AARP Bulletin Dec 2014       > >>       > >> I'm not saying that there aren't valid reasons for speed limits.       > >>       > >> I'm saying that the idea that speeders--defined simply as those who are       > >> violating a posted limit--are more dangerous than drunk drivers is       > >> nonsense.       > >       > > Yes, they could be for a simple reason: They outnumber DUI drivers many       > > times. Again, this is only on roads where pedestrians are present or       > > could be present. Usually this limit is 30mph around here, but often       > > ignored.       >       > You still don't get it.       >       > If you lower the speed limit to 5mph, then everyone is a speeder, right?       >       > But has it really changed the reality of the roads? No.       >       > Think for a while.              So tell me, what do you think the *real speed* should be through communities?       Should it be 20, 30, 45 mph?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca