Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,179 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 161,280 of 162,179    |
|    Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Phi to Alan Baker    |
|    Re: Daylight Running Lights    |
|    17 Dec 14 18:27:53    |
      From: thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com              On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:37:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > On 2014-12-17 19:30:50 +0000, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic Enterprises       said:              > > In the process they have killed many communities, giving rise to the       > > infamous gated communities. Are you willing to pay to live in a       > > community where the kids can play? Then go to a gated communities.       >       > I'm sorry, but what evidence do you have that cars have "killed many       > communities"?              You can't have communities without pedestrians/cyclists. What you get is       sprawl where nobody meets anyone. You must drive everywhere, and public       transportation is nearly dysfunctional.              It's a desert with an oasis here and there. And you must drive from here to       there.       >       > >       > > I believe there's a medium ground between unleashed traffic and       > > controlled traffic, where the pedestrians feel safer. It may be argued       > > that the SUV (the American supersized SUV) has no place in civilized       > > cities.       > >       > > In many ways, I think the trend is toward feudalism. The knights and       > > lords rule over the land. We just need to get rid of the terminology of       > > "democracy." The lords rule from gated communities and castles. They       > > don't live with the commoners, whose concerns are always ignored.       > >       > > I don't think the "freedom of movement" is negotiable. It's not that       > > you don't accept certain risks involved with walking/riding a bike,       > > just that many solutions are really common sense. Speed cameras are       > > just one example.       >       > Speed cameras are simply a revenue grab. One can tell this because       > they're typically placed where almost everyone is exceeding the posted       > limit, and as has been studied and revealed, where that is happening,       > it is almost always the limit that is wrong and not the drivers.              They are but they may accomplish something worthwhile. DUIs are also a revenue       grab but they somewhat mitigate the problem of drunk drivers.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca