From: thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com   
      
   On Sunday, January 4, 2015 8:28:50 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > On 2015-01-04 23:22:06 +0000, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic Enterprises   
   said:   
   >   
   > > On Sunday, January 4, 2015 5:46:14 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >> On 2015-01-04 22:43:11 +0000, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic Enterprises   
   said:   
   > >>   
   > >>> On Saturday, January 3, 2015 1:35:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:   
   > >>>> On 2015-01-03 17:19:34 +0000, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble   
   Philosopher said:   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>> On Saturday, January 3, 2015 9:23:54 AM UTC-5, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most   
   > >>>>> Humble Philosopher wrote:   
   > >>>>>> You drivers are placing the noose around your own neck. Your   
   radicalism   
   > >>>>>> doesn't even tolerate the bicycle. The bicycle infrastructure is non   
   > >>>>>> existent or dysfunctional. Public transportation is highly   
   > >>>>>> dysfunctional too. You oppose trains in the city. You oppose fast   
   > >>>>>> trains as well. What's next?   
   > >>>>>>   
   > >>>>>> "Carmageddon!"   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> I don't think we should turn this into a class struggle issue because   
   > >>>>> we often are both cyclists and drivers.   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Naturally the bicycle is the most democratic vehicle of the two and the   
   > >>>>> one that keeps you in touch with your community. I don't think you   
   > >>>>> should even vote if you don't ride a bike. You don't know what's going   
   > >>>>> on. You don't know about crime. You don't know about broken sidewalks.   
   > >>>>> You don't know about corruption.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> More completely bullshit.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>>>   
   > >>>>> Everything is dysfunctional. You think we want free facilities. No, we   
   > >>>>> don't want any of that. Bike lanes don't work, not connected, used for   
   > >>>>> deliveries. They become another excuse for corruption.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> I KNOW you receive free facilities.   
   > >>>>   
   > >>>> Who will pay for those if you actually eliminate car use?   
   > >>>   
   > >>> "Eliminate car use?"   
   > >>>   
   > >>> I tell you drivers tend to be radical. I want to retire the bad drivers   
   > >>> so the other forms of transportation as well as the good drivers can   
   > >>> enjoy more room.   
   > >>   
   > >> I want to require all drivers to be good drivers... ...or lose their   
   > >> right to drive.   
   > >   
   > > Well, we need those SPEED CAMERAS to start separating the good drivers   
   > > from the bad drivers.   
   >   
   > No. We don't.   
   >   
   > Speed cameras tell you precisely nothing about whether some is a good   
   > driver or not.   
   >   
   > >   
   > > Hint: Good drivers don't go speeding on city streets. They should have   
   > > a working passing lane on freeways.   
   >   
   > If by "speeding" you mean "exceeding the posted limit", then you can   
   > make every driver into a "bad" driver simply by lowering the limit to a   
   > ridiculous number.   
   >   
   > The simple fact is that traffic engineers and scientists recommend   
   > setting limits at the 85th percentile of free flowing traffic speed. A   
   > limit set below that will result in many good drivers exceeding it.   
      
   Excuses, excuses, excuses. The best drivers --the Germans-- coexist with   
   cameras. They go fast where they can.   
      
   You must be a very selfish driver.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)