Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,178 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 161,372 of 162,178    |
|    Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Phi to Most Humble Philosopher    |
|    Re: Myth: The motor car is the ultimate     |
|    04 Jan 15 21:49:53    |
      From: thetibetanmonkey@gmail.com              On Monday, January 5, 2015 12:27:58 AM UTC-5, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble       Philosopher wrote:       > On Sunday, January 4, 2015 11:00:12 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > > On 2015-01-05 03:43:52 +0000, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher       said:       > >       > > > On Sunday, January 4, 2015 8:28:50 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > > >> On 2015-01-04 23:22:06 +0000, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic       Enterprises said:       > > >>       > > >>> On Sunday, January 4, 2015 5:46:14 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > > >>>> On 2015-01-04 22:43:11 +0000, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic       Enterprises said:       > > >>>>       > > >>>>> On Saturday, January 3, 2015 1:35:08 PM UTC-5, Alan Baker wrote:       > > >>>>>> On 2015-01-03 17:19:34 +0000, Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble       Philosopher said:       > > >>>>>>       > > >>>>>>> On Saturday, January 3, 2015 9:23:54 AM UTC-5, Wise TibetanMonkey,       Most       > > >>>>>>> Humble Philosopher wrote:       > > >>>>>>>> You drivers are placing the noose around your own neck. Your       radicalism       > > >>>>>>>> doesn't even tolerate the bicycle. The bicycle infrastructure is       non       > > >>>>>>>> existent or dysfunctional. Public transportation is highly       > > >>>>>>>> dysfunctional too. You oppose trains in the city. You oppose fast       > > >>>>>>>> trains as well. What's next?       > > >>>>>>>>       > > >>>>>>>> "Carmageddon!"       > > >>>>>>>       > > >>>>>>> I don't think we should turn this into a class struggle issue       because       > > >>>>>>> we often are both cyclists and drivers.       > > >>>>>>>       > > >>>>>>> Naturally the bicycle is the most democratic vehicle of the two       and the       > > >>>>>>> one that keeps you in touch with your community. I don't think you       > > >>>>>>> should even vote if you don't ride a bike. You don't know what's       going       > > >>>>>>> on. You don't know about crime. You don't know about broken       sidewalks.       > > >>>>>>> You don't know about corruption.       > > >>>>>>       > > >>>>>> More completely bullshit.       > > >>>>>>       > > >>>>>>>       > > >>>>>>> Everything is dysfunctional. You think we want free facilities.       No, we       > > >>>>>>> don't want any of that. Bike lanes don't work, not connected, used       for       > > >>>>>>> deliveries. They become another excuse for corruption.       > > >>>>>>       > > >>>>>> I KNOW you receive free facilities.       > > >>>>>>       > > >>>>>> Who will pay for those if you actually eliminate car use?       > > >>>>>       > > >>>>> "Eliminate car use?"       > > >>>>>       > > >>>>> I tell you drivers tend to be radical. I want to retire the bad       drivers       > > >>>>> so the other forms of transportation as well as the good drivers can       > > >>>>> enjoy more room.       > > >>>>       > > >>>> I want to require all drivers to be good drivers... ...or lose their       > > >>>> right to drive.       > > >>>       > > >>> Well, we need those SPEED CAMERAS to start separating the good drivers       > > >>> from the bad drivers.       > > >>       > > >> No. We don't.       > > >>       > > >> Speed cameras tell you precisely nothing about whether some is a good       > > >> driver or not.       > > >>       > > >>>       > > >>> Hint: Good drivers don't go speeding on city streets. They should have       > > >>> a working passing lane on freeways.       > > >>       > > >> If by "speeding" you mean "exceeding the posted limit", then you can       > > >> make every driver into a "bad" driver simply by lowering the limit to a       > > >> ridiculous number.       > > >>       > > >> The simple fact is that traffic engineers and scientists recommend       > > >> setting limits at the 85th percentile of free flowing traffic speed. A       > > >> limit set below that will result in many good drivers exceeding it.       > > >       > > > Excuses, excuses, excuses. The best drivers --the Germans-- coexist       > > > with cameras. They go fast where they can.       > >       > > And you can co-exist with a lot of things...       > >       > > ...that doesn't make it optimal.       > >       > > Speed cameras aren't about improving safety. You pay the ticket, but       > > you don't get any points on your license.       > >       > > Hence, you don't get removed from the driver pool unless you are very       > > unlucky and poor.       > >       >       > Well, you boasted of not having tickets in the last 10 years and all of a       sudden the speed cameras worry you. What gives?              Proper bike lanes:              http://i881.photobucket.com/albums/ac18/thetibetanmonkey/CORRUPT       ON/IMG_20140210_120026_zpsb219ebe1.jpg              That's not America, not even Europe. That's Ecuador, a country that used to be       a Banana Republic. One of the trademarks of Banana Republic is corruption.              The mafia in Sicily invested in highways that remained empty. That's how they       work: Construction, Destruction, Corruption.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca