Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.autos.driving    |    Automobile discussion (general)    |    162,179 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 161,738 of 162,179    |
|    The Real Bev to Erik Meltzer    |
|    Re: Autobahn    |
|    16 May 18 09:57:37    |
      From: bashley101@gmail.com              On 05/16/2018 09:04 AM, Erik Meltzer wrote:       > Hi!       >       > On 16.05.2018 17:52, The Real Bev wrote:       >> On 05/16/2018 04:14 AM, Erik Meltzer wrote:       >>> Is this group dead, or is something wrong with my feed?       >>       >> Nope, this is the new 'normal'. The only really active groups, at least       >> of the 30 or so I subscribe to, seem to be computer-related. Everyone       >> else seems to have migrated to facebook, which is a real shame. It's no       >> substitute.       >       > Nothing that's controlled by a company is a substitute, by definition.       > They'll all disappear some day. Usenet won't (it might keep getting       > smaller, but there'll always be a geek with a newsserver somewhere).              My ISP discontinued its newsserver subscription years ago. Apparently       it was expensive and not used all that much. Toward what I assume is       the end, the helpdroids didn't even know what usenet was. One of them       thought it was maybe some sort of satellite service.              I don't know how news.eternal-september stays in business, but we owe       him/them a lot.              >> Are there still no speed limits on the Autobahn?       >       > Most Autobahns are unlimited, but those most travelled typically have       > a 120 km/h limit these days. Some have adaptive speed limits: huge       > illuminated signs that can show different speed limits (and other       > signs like "no overtaking for trucks" or "fog" etc.) according to       > conditions. When conditions are good and traffic is light, most of       > those are unlimited too.       >       > But most drivers seem to have slowed down.              The freeways are miserably crowded in the Los Angeles area now.       Doubling the number of lanes would only -- at best -- cut the traffic in       half, and that would still be miserable. Just too many people now, and       I don't see any way to improve that. 'Rush hour' now lasts from 6am to       10am or later and 3pm to god knows when. We're all doomed :-( Even       thinking about speed limits most of the time is silly.              > I don't see nearly as       > many speeding past me with 200+ km/h as I did a decade ago. I don't       > think fuel prices are the reason; they haven't risen that much.       > Probably a combination of more traffic and more thinking? Well,       > maybe I'm just being optimistic.       >       > My feel-good speed varies between 100 and 160 km/h (60 to 100 mph)       > depending on circumstances and conditions.              Sounds reasonable. It depends on lack of crowding and time traveled at       a high speed -- after a while it begins to seem slow and I speed up       without thinking. Easy to drive on autopilot if the highway is good and       nobody else is using it. I love Utah.              --       Cheers, Bev        "On the other hand, I live in California so I'd be willing to        squeeze schoolchildren to death if I thought some oil would        come out." -- Scott Adams              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca