From: News@Group.Name   
      
   On 3/14/2024 5:43 AM, Mark wrote:   
   > geoff  wrote:   
   >> On 14/03/2024 9:41 am, geoff wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> The difference being maybe that MAS is running short of $$$ and MAH isn't ?   
   >>   
   >> Lysdexic.... 'HAM'.   
   >   
   > Yes...but that raises a different question. I think it's generally   
   > understood that this kind of litigation needs deep pockets and is far   
   > from a sure bet...and that's even with compelling evidence, which the   
   > ramblings of an unreliable witness is not, IMO. If Massa is short of   
   > cash, this kind of thing will require lots of money which will be tied   
   > up for years, during which time he will find he's not welcome in a   
   > number of F1-related activities, further reducing his ability to earn.   
   >   
   > If that's the case - and I think it is - *someone* is bankrolling this.   
   > So, I'd be interested in knowing who is supporting him and (more   
   > importantly) their motivation for doing so.   
   >   
   > It wouldn't even surprise me if it had nothing to do with Hamilton (*or*   
   > Massa), but rather some sort of axe being ground elsewhere in the FIA or   
   > F1. It's destabilising and another unwelcome distraction.   
   >   
   > All very odd.   
      
      
   Or is it designed to pot-stir, thus attract more attention?   
      
   "Stay tuned ... for the next exciting episode of F1 in Chains"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)