From: nuh-uh@nope.com   
      
   On 2024-05-18 12:40, Bob Latham wrote:   
   > In article ,   
   >     Alan  wrote:   
   >> On 2024-05-18 01:40, Bob Latham wrote:   
   >>> In article ,   
   >>>      Alan  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> He was found to have committed rape (by the common usage of the   
   >>>> word) by a jury.   
   >>>   
   >>> Was he sentenced and punished for that? If not why not?   
   >   
   >> Do you mean that if he wasn't sentenced and punished, you can't   
   >> trust the jury's decision?   
   >   
   > I can honestly say I've no idea if the jury was correct or   
   > trustworthy.   
      
   But if he'd been sentenced and punished it would change that, loser?   
      
   >   
   >   
   >>>   
   >>> If he was, then by all means dislike him and don't vote for him   
   >>> but also don't drag the judicial system into a political war with   
   >>> silly charges because doing so is evil.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> But this disgraceful sham trial set up by the utterly corrupt   
   >>>>> lefty justice system makes the USA's legal system shameful.   
   >>>   
   >>>> Really?   
   >>>   
   >>>> Questions:   
   >>>   
   >>>> Do you really think that Trump declassified all of the   
   >>>> classified documents he kept?   
   >>>   
   >>>> If yes, why did he takes such pains to hide them from those who   
   >>>> cam looking?   
   >   
   > I've no idea.   
      
   You acknowledge it happened, right?   
      
   >   
   >> You didn't even try to answer either of these questions, huh?   
   >   
   > I don't know the answer so I couldn't. Of course neither do you, it's   
   > only your hatred that thinks it  knows the answers.   
      
   The answers are pretty clear...   
      
   ...to anyone who's honest enough to look.   
      
   >   
   >>>> Did he falsify business records in order to hide a payment made   
   >>>> to a porn actress he slept with?   
   >>>   
   >>> And yet, we know that when asked multiple times "what exactly are   
   >>> you accusing Trump of" by the defence (or what the clearly biased   
   >>> judge allows of the defence)  no clear answer has been   
   >>> forthcoming.   
   >   
   >> Actually it has been completely forthcoming to anyone with more   
   >> than half a brain (which apparently lets out you AND Trump):   
   >   
   >> Trump is being charged with falsifying business records to cover up   
   >> violations of election finance law.   
   >   
   > Well the story I heard was that there was upset because Trump paid   
   > for something himself instead of using party funds.   
      
   Really? And where did you "hear" this.   
      
   The point is: the funds were paid to influence the outcome of the   
   election...   
      
   ...BUT THEY WEREN'T RECORDED AS SUCH.   
      
   >   
   >> Falsifying business records in New York is a misdemeanour...   
   >   
   >> ...UNLESS it is done to cover up another crime...   
   >   
   >> ...and violating election finance laws IS a crime.   
   >   
   > The irony after the absolute fraud on voting machines and postal   
   > votes that went down at the last election to place a man that can   
   > hardly stand or put a sentence together in the white house .   
   >   
      
   What a pity you don't apply the same standard you just used above, huh?   
      
   What? Can't remember just a few lines ago? Let me help:   
      
   'I don't know the answer so I couldn't. Of course neither do you, it's   
   only your hatred that thinks it  knows the answers.'   
      
   What we DO know is that no one has come forward with actual evidence   
   that any of that happened.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)