From: mpconmy@gmail.com   
      
   a425couple wrote:   
   > On 10/15/25 03:45, Mark wrote:   
   >> a425couple wrote:   
   >>> On 10/9/25 03:16, Mark wrote:   
   >>> Ahhh, errrrr   
   >>>   
   >>>> Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!   
   >>>> 😉 >   
   >>>> Mark   
   >>>   
   >>> I hate to disrupt a perfect situation,,,, ahhh, err,   
   >>> But bearing in mind   
   >>> #1   
   >>> https://replica.seattletimes.com/html5/reader/production/def   
   ult.aspx?pubname=&pubid=84d463e0-c035-4c49-902d-95c722bfe073   
   >>   
   >> I have no idea what this is about. Am I missing something?   
   >>   
   >>> and #2, I think I understand the scoring if the 4 picks are perfectly   
   >>> correct, But I am really murky on the 'near miss' points.   
   >>>   
   >>> I did something unusual for me and looked back at prior numbers,,,,   
   >>>   
   >>> But, still, it seems that if it is correct, that I had 202 points   
   >>> after Azer, and if I scored 8 at Sing, then the listed   
   >>> new total of 208 seems inconsistent.   
   >>>   
   >>> Or, is that the whole purpose of "Super secret double blind probation"?   
   >>   
   >> Right...I'm back from my holidays so here goes.   
   >>   
   >> I didn't notice anything, but it's all (pretty much) automated so unless   
   >> someone challenges it, I don't go back and recompute.   
   >>   
   >> I have _no_ idea what went wrong here. I've just rerun the script and   
   >> there are a number of numbers that didn't match up including yours. Is   
   >> this any better?   
   >   
   > Yes. "Some math I saw,,, did not math!"   
   > (totals did not add up correctly)   
   > (202 plus 8 does not equal 208!)   
   > So yes, this is better.   
      
   I can't tell you _what_ happened - or why it happened - but I can tell   
   you what the impact was.   
      
   Something affected the results for race 3. It's like the system got   
   confused about the results for just that one race. I could probably work   
   out which results were different...but I can't see an issue with the   
   table, and the results page is autogenerated from a scrape of the web.   
      
   This is where it gets *weird*. It doesn't just affect you, and it has   
   happened before to those affected just for race 3. No-one has noticed.   
   Appended, though, are your results since race 3...and you can see race 3   
   sometimes loses 2 points for no obvious reason. Everything else is   
   right.   
      
   This is going to irritate me until I can explain it...   
      
   > I hope you had a great vacation.   
   > I truly hope my post did not add stress or distraction.   
   >   
   > Thank you very much for your work on this that helps   
   > add a considerable amount of interest for us.   
      
   Not a problem...other than finding a bug!   
      
    3 a425couple 16 12 12   
    40   
    4 a425couple 16 12 10 8   
    46   
    5 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6   
    54   
    6 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18   
    70   
    7 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12   
    84   
    8 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8   
    90   
    9 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20   
    110   
   10 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    116   
   11 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    12 128   
   12 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    12 12 140   
   13 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    12 12 18 158   
   14 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    12 12 18 18 174   
   15 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    12 12 18 18 12 188   
   16 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    12 12 18 18 12 10 198   
   17 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 202   
   18 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4   
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 208   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|