home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.radio.amateur.misc      Amateur radio practices, contests, event      23,974 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 22,253 of 23,974   
   Stephen Thomas Cole to Ian Jackson   
   Re: Southgate Amateur Radio News for Sat   
   07 Aug 16 05:43:48   
   
   XPost: uk.radio.amateur   
   From: usenet@stephenthomascole.com   
      
   Ian Jackson  wrote:   
   > In message , mm0fmf    
   > writes   
   >> On 06/08/2016 19:38, Ian Jackson wrote:   
   >>> In message , mm0fmf  writes   
   >>>> On 06/08/2016 16:51, Ian Jackson wrote:   
   >>>>> In message , Stephen Thomas Cole   
   >>>>>  writes   
   >>>>>> Ian Jackson  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> But in this case, it looks like OFCOM have simply started re-using any   
   >>>>>>> available callsign that has lapsed or is otherwise no longer current -   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Excellent news! I've just put in my application for G3OHX once that   
   >>>>>> one's   
   >>>>>> freed up.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> To make sure you get it, I'll add a codicil to my will.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I'm strongly in favour of recycling calls. Kills all the call sign   
   >>>> snobbery dead when you don't know if a G3 is original or new.   
   >>>   
   >>> Class-Bs, FLs, ILs and Fulls should know their place!   
   >>>   
   >>>> Then you can decide if someone is an idiot on how they act not on when   
   >>>> they were licenced.   
   >>>   
   >>> Actually, I've never been a callsign snob - but using an old-timer's   
   >>> recycled callsign seems a strange thing to do - especially if you've got   
   >>> a perfectly good one of your own.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >> If I didn't know you were trolling, I'd think you were quite clueless!   
   >> Where not talking about reissuing calls to people who have them but   
   >> issuing them to people who have just passed their test.   
   >   
   > You know, I do believe I already understood that.   
   >   
   > They have (hopefully only accidentally) re-issued, to new licensees,   
   > callsigns that had been issued previously - but which had been expired   
   > for at least two years.   
   >   
   > They go on to say that if you have been issued one of these recycled   
   > callsigns - and don't like having a recycled callsign - you can ask for   
   > it to be replaced by a brand spanking new one. [There seems to be no   
   > intention of making you give up the recycled callsign.]   
      
   Ian, please stop trolling the group. You're ruining Usenet for us all with   
   this behaviour.   
      
   --   
   STC / M0TEY /   
   http://twitter.com/ukradioamateur   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca