Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.radio.amateur.misc    |    Amateur radio practices, contests, event    |    23,974 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,260 of 23,974    |
|    Rob to Ian Jackson    |
|    Re: Southgate Amateur Radio News for Sat    |
|    07 Aug 16 08:23:53    |
   
   XPost: uk.radio.amateur   
   From: nomail@example.com   
      
   Ian Jackson wrote:   
   > They have (hopefully only accidentally) re-issued, to new licensees,   
   > callsigns that had been issued previously - but which had been expired   
   > for at least two years.   
   >   
   > They go on to say that if you have been issued one of these recycled   
   > callsigns - and don't like having a recycled callsign - you can ask for   
   > it to be replaced by a brand spanking new one. [There seems to be no   
   > intention of making you give up the recycled callsign.]   
      
   What is the point of recycling old callsigns when new ones are still   
   available? I could understand that it is being done when all callsigns   
   in a series have been used up.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca