XPost: rec.radio.amateur.policy, uk.radio.amateur   
   From: jeff@ukra.com   
      
   > Personally, I only became aware of the many strange nuances of the rules   
   > by reading them and then comparing the BR68 with the Terms & Conditions,   
   > and working out the actual legal meaning which is vastly different with   
   > a small change of wording. A good example is a small change between   
   > "must be used" and "should be used" - quite different legal meaning.   
   > Another good example is the Phonetic Alphabet which was published in the   
   > BR68, and now we don't have to use the correct words as the legislation   
   > has been changes to "it is recommended that"   
   >   
      
   You obviously didn't read  & compare BR68 that well, because even BR68   
   only said that the Phonetic Alphabet "may be used". No compulsion there   
   either!!   
      
   Jeff   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)