Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.radio.amateur.misc    |    Amateur radio practices, contests, event    |    23,974 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,478 of 23,974    |
|    Spike to Jerry Stuckle    |
|    Re: Tenth Anniversary of rec.radio.amate    |
|    20 Feb 17 15:36:42    |
      From: Aero.Spike@mail.invalid              On 20/02/2017 13:55, Jerry Stuckle wrote:       > On 2/20/2017 4:10 AM, Spike wrote:              >>> The Usenet newsgroup rec.radio.amateur.moderated will be ten years old       >>> this month, having been created on February 22, 2007.              >> rec.radio.amateur.moderated is all but dead - it hasn't had a new topic       >> from an individual poster there since last September, for heaven's sake       >> that's five months. It's been on its death-bed for ages. Do it a       >> kindness and pull the plug.              > It doesn't need its plug pulled. What it needs is a moderator who       > doesn't spam usenet with other people's blogs. And some of it seems to       > be without the permission of the authors, which is a copyright violation.              Naughty.              >>> We are also pleased to see another high-quality moderated newsgroup for       >>> amateur radio, this one for the United Kingdom,       >>> uk.radio.amateur.moderated, created on December 15, 2015.              >> And since March 2016 it has been in decline; posts, new threads, and       >> posters have all gone down by very significant amounts. A regular report       >> on UKRAM, posted in its sister unmoderated group, has had to be revised       >> to 28-day reporting periods (from the original 7 days) to help disguise       >> the fall in numbers. By the poor standard of RRAM it's doing well,       >> though, but the parallels are there and that isn't saying much.              > You keep claiming that, but the facts speak otherwise. And you had to       > change your reporting period to try to hide the amount of activity on it.              LOL. You do realise what you just said there?              > Sorry, your attempts to close a newsgroup that doesn't allow your vile       > bullcrap isn't working.              "Einmal solche Macht in mein handen zu haben"              >>> If you haven't participated on Usenet in a while -- either by reading or       >>> posting -- please consider rejoining us. If you've never been on       >>> Usenet, we invite you to give it a try!              >> 'Don't bother' is the best pragmatic advice that can be given here.              > As it stands now, I agree.              >>> Usenet is still very much alive, and can be a useful venue for many       >>> topics, including amateur radio.              >> The rest of the rec.radio groups are either essentially moribund,       >> blog-fests, or some combination of the two. They are not even retaining       >> people, let alone attracting new contributors. What is needed is a       >> complete and utter revamp, preferably by a team having the capability of       >> original thinking, to renew and relaunch the current system, which has       >> totally failed.              > Again, it is the reposting of blogs that has driven people away.              Quite. I really don't understand what the thinking was regarding the blogs.              >> UKRA might have its issues, but lack of use isn't one of them - and it       >> contains in one week more AR-related posts than the combination of the       >> entire rec.radio group plus UKRAM.              > When you take away all of the vile bullshit from you and your pals, UKRA       > has is even less amateur radio related stuff than there is on rram.       > That's why ukram was formed and why it is successful.              The mods have to keep terminating OT thread drift, after which it goes       quiet.              >> You need to find out why this should be so, and apply it to the failed       >> rec.radio hierarchy.              > The answer is simple. But those who repost blogs aren't listening.       > They think they know it all already.              Oh, and how it shows!                     --       Spike       Keep calm and carry on!       Suspect someone is claiming a benefit under false pretences and       depriving those in real need? Incapacity Benefit or Personal       Independence Payment when they don't need it? IB and PIP are not       zero-sum systems! And that's not a claim!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca