Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.radio.amateur.misc    |    Amateur radio practices, contests, event    |    23,974 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,859 of 23,974    |
|    Spike to Brian Reay    |
|    Re: Southgate Amateur Radio News for Thu    |
|    09 Mar 18 09:53:48    |
      XPost: rec.radio.amateur.policy, uk.radio.amateur       From: Aero.Spike@mail.invalid              On 09/03/2018 07:25, Brian Reay wrote:       > On 08/03/2018 21:02, Spike wrote:       >> On 08/03/2018 14:12, Brian Reay wrote:              >>> As for the registration process for DSTAR, assuming it is similar to       >>> that for the DMR system, it is a formality - provided you have a       >>> licence. It just assigns a number you put into your radio so it       >>> identifies it on the system.              >> Admission to RSGBTech is supposed to be a formality, according to the       >> RSGB, but look what turned up - so your honeyed words hardly reflect       >> the state of play in some areas at least.              >> The registration process for DSTAR is regretfully an opportunity for       >> Little Hitlers to come out and play - not that I'm saying any involved       >> in the process are in fact playing Littler Hitlers, but the       >> opportunity is there - and it wouldn't be the first time that systems       >> in the AR field of endeavour have been compromised in this way.              > Don't worry Spike, the type of people you are worried about- eg those       > who invent special criteria/titles such as "Class A Licenses" - are too       > busy ranting and raving to actually become involved in anything       > productive which contributes to amateur radio.              You can always tell a teacher, but you can't tell him much - although we       do our best in the interests of AR.              I see your legal group charm offensive has run out of steam, so it's       obviously back to your ad-hom fall-back position.                     --       Spike              "RSGBTech is meant for everyone", or so the RSGB says. The group is       moderated 'to       ensure that the questions are on topic', but the group's own admissions       policy mention       (a pre-) 'vet', 'known', 'trouble', and 'maker', but not the vetting       policy! None of these are       'moderation' issues and none are mentioned in the RSGB's Guidelines.....              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca