XPost: uk.radio.amateur, rec.radio.amateur.policy   
   From: Aero.Spike@mail.invalid   
      
   On 09/03/2018 10:23, Roger Hayter wrote:   
   > CB/M0TEY stephenthomascole.com> wrote:   
   >> Spike  wrote:   
   >>> On 08/03/2018 14:12, Brian Reay wrote:   
      
   >>>> As for the registration process for DSTAR, assuming it is similar to   
   >>>> that for the DMR system, it is a formality - provided you have a   
   >>>> licence. It just assigns a number you put into your radio so it   
   >>>> identifies it on the system.   
      
   >>> Admission to RSGBTech is supposed to be a formality, according   
   >>> to the RSGB, but look what turned up   
      
   >> Couldn't be simpler, Burt; I didn't even have to apply! Very efficient, a   
   >> credit to the RSGB!   
      
   > You did have to manage some pretty intensive long-term sycophancy with a   
   > not wholly sympathetic character first though. I think *I* could have   
   > got in that way!   
      
   Nice burn.   
      
      
   --   
   Spike   
      
   "RSGBTech is meant for everyone", or so the RSGB says. The group is   
   moderated 'to   
   ensure that the questions are on topic', but the group's own admissions   
   policy mention   
   (a pre-) 'vet', 'known', 'trouble', and 'maker', but not the vetting   
   policy! None of these are   
   'moderation' issues and none are mentioned in the RSGB's Guidelines.....   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)