Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.radio.amateur.misc    |    Amateur radio practices, contests, event    |    23,971 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 23,339 of 23,971    |
|    andyW to Ian Jackson    |
|    Re: [Southgate] Ofcom speedily respond t    |
|    04 Mar 21 08:37:19    |
      XPost: rec.radio.amateur.policy, uk.radio.amateur       From: andrew@nojunqmail.com              On 04/03/2021 07:53, Ian Jackson wrote:              > One of my past cars had an infrared fob. It had a range of about 3 feet,       > and seemed to do a perfect job of opening and closing the car.       > Circuit-wise, it was probably less-complicated than an RF fob (and       > receiver), and almost certainly totally immune to RF interference. Are       > RF fobs not simply technology for technology's sake?              You are 100% correct, it is grossly over engineered for the base       problem, however RF tech is cheap and easy. IR fobs are rarer and       therefore more expensive.       It all comes down to money.              Andy              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca