Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.radio.amateur.dx    |    Discussion, tips, notices and news for D    |    5,937 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 4,159 of 5,937    |
|    Michael Black to pschleck@novia.net    |
|    Re: 3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated    |
|    13 Feb 07 19:02:40    |
      XPost: rec.radio.amateur.antenna, rec.radio.amateur.equipment, r       c.radio.amateur.homebrew       XPost: rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors, rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc,       rec.radio.amateur.space       From: et472@FreeNet.Carleton.CA              "Paul W. Schleck, K3FU" (pschleck@novia.net) writes:       > The following was just posted to Usenet by the news.announce.newgroups       > moderator on behalf of the Big-8 Management Board:       >       And for the third time, you still ignore part of the hierarchy.              While the first RFD ignored the hierarchy except for .misc and .policy,       and the second RFD added .antennas and .dx, this third RFD long after       the discussion started still ignores three of the newsgroups in       the hierarchy:        rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors        rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc        rec.radio.amateur.space              In the end, you can't speak for the hierarchy if you don't even       know which newsgroups exist in the hierarchy. No wonder you have       such disregard for the hierarchy, you only think of yourself as some       "administrator" type rather than a participant.              You aren't building bridges, you're imposing your vision on the hierarchy.       The fact that you still don't come to the hierarchy and simply talk to us,       isntead hiding behind the structure of creating a new newsgroup, says       everything about your relationship to newsgroups.              IN the end, I conclude that you like moderated newsgroups because Usenet       never sat well with you, and the only way you can deal with it is impose       your need for rules on something that is a haven from that.              Ultimately, you are like the problem posters. Neither of you can live       without rules, though you need them because you can't tolerate the lack of       rules, while they need them because they think the lack of rules is license       to do as they please.              You've spent the decade trying to impose rules on the hierarchy, while       the rest of us were actually trying to make the hierarchy good by       participating in the discussions.              Useless administrators are always trumped by people doing things.               Michael VE2BVW                            > http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=nan:2007-02-13-rec.r       dio.amateur.moderated-lcc       >       > This is a Request for Discussion (RFD) and Last Call for Comments (LCC)       > to create a new moderated discussion newsgroup for amateur radio on       > Usenet. It has been relayed to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,       > rec.radio.amateur.dx, rec.radio.amateur.equipment, and       > rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, as announced in the RFD/LCC. Please       > consider contributing your opinions regarding this newsgroup to       > news.groups.proposals, where followups to this message have been set.       >       > --       > 73, Paul W. Schleck, K3FU       > pschleck@novia.net       > http://www.novia.net/~pschleck/       > Finger pschleck@novia.net for PGP Public Key       >       >       >       >              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca