Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    rec.radio.amateur.dx    |    Discussion, tips, notices and news for D    |    5,937 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,610 of 5,937    |
|    Michael Black to CQ Newsroom via rec.radio.info Admi    |
|    Re: CQ Newsroom: Petition Drive to Save     |
|    30 Aug 18 11:22:36    |
      XPost: rec.radio.amateur.equipment       From: mblack@pubnix.net              On Thu, 30 Aug 2018, CQ Newsroom via rec.radio.info Admin wrote:              >       > CQ Newsroom       >       > ///////////////////////////////////////////       > Petition Drive to Save WWV/WWVH - Sept. 15 Deadline       >              And CQ is late, and lacking.              This "news" has been around for a few weeks, I know I kept checking CQ's       newspage to see if they were on the ball.              But, they perpetuate the notion that this is about WWV/WWVH, which may be       the least of the issue, except for radio hobbyists who feel nostalgia for       those time stations.              Nobody seems to explicitly mention it, except in followups, but this may       (since it's not mentioned by callsign) include WWVB. That will have way       more fallout than WWV/WWVH, since many a consumer clock and weather       station and maybe other things rely on WWVB, at 60KHz, to self-set the       time everynight. I have five around, plus a Casio Waveceptor watch which       at least is useful in other continents. It's something created because       WWVB is there, but also because electronics got so cheap. The market is a       relatively new thing. If nothing else, it gives a clock one can rely on,       in an age when so much electronics includes a clock, and none of them       matching time. Just a few years ago, NIST added a new moduclation       component as an attempt at improved reception on the fringe areas, I ahve       no idea how well that worked since I don't have a newer clock that can       decode the new modulation scheme. But at that time, I think it was, NIST       announced that WWVB was no longer considered a frequency standard, so it       really exists to reset all those "atomic clocks" to the right time. WWVB       is the key issue here, since all those consumers will not like having       "atomic clocks" that no longer keep good time. One has to look a bit to       see real truth, it's not just about relaying what someone else said.               Michael              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca