Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,376 of 72,318    |
|    Winfield Hill to All    |
|    Re: Bifilar inductor?    |
|    07 Jan 18 16:34:21    |
      From: hill@rowland.harvard.edu              John Larkin wrote...       > Winfield Hill wrote:       >> John Larkin wrote...       >>>       >>> You can do fun switcher tricks with a dual inductor.       >>       >> Coupled inductor, John. Coupled is the word to use.       >       > I ignore the Word Police.               I have about 300 files in my computer concerning        coupled inductors, they're all the rage these days.        Most providers, and there are many, use the term        coupled inductor. Your DRQ supplier, SRF and a        few others call them "dual winding." TI and other        app note writers call them coupled inductors. Both        Coilcraft and Coilmaster, who have piles of offerings,        call them coupled inductors. Ditto Vishay and Wurth.        Published peer-reviewed papers say coupled inductors.               If you want to search for them, coupled inductors is        the phrase. Octopart comes up with about 1500 parts        that way, but only 184 searching for dual winding.        Of course, they're all the same bifilar wound stuff,        but that search term gets zero hits at Octopart. And        the O.P's title, bifilar inductor, gets only 5 hits.                     --        Thanks,        - Win              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca