Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,435 of 72,318    |
|    Jeff Layman to Bret Cahill    |
|    Re: Converting Large Vessels To Na-S Bat    |
|    01 Feb 18 10:37:12    |
      From: JMLayman@invalid.invalid              On 01/02/18 04:15, Bret Cahill wrote:       > Knowing ship owners are the cheapest folk on the planet, it's 100% certain       similar calculation have been done before:       >       > Vessel displacement: 1,000 kilo ton (~300 m LOA)       >       > Prop power: 80 MW       >       > Na-S battery density: 0.150 MW-hr/ton       >       > Voyage time: 720 hours       >       > 57,600 MW-hrs       >       > 80 X 720 / 0.150 = 384 kilotons ~ 38% of the weight of the loaded ship       >       > The ship loses about a quarter of it's cargo capacity but can eliminate most       or all of the double bottom tank volume.       >       >       > Bret Cahill              Large ships make their money by moving goods as quickly and cheaply as       possible. Turnaround time in port is often less than 48 hours,       sometimes less than 24. That means to partially recharge the batteries       they will need around a 1GW supplied every hour (based on your 57.6       GW-hrs figure). You're going to need quite a few power stations to be       able to supply that amount of energy on top of normal consumption (plus       that for all the proposed electric cars which will be around?).              --              Jeff              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca