home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.electronics.basics      Elementary questions about electronics      72,318 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 70,446 of 72,318   
   M Philbrook to All   
   Re: True RMS multimeter?   
   03 Feb 18 09:59:35   
   
   From: jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net   
      
   In article ,   
   jurb6006@gmail.com says...   
   >   
   > They are all off base here. Actually I am surprised Phil didn't mention it.   
   >   
   > Compare the readings with the same peak to peak value o a sine wave and a   
   square wave. If they read the same it is not true RMS. If it is true RMS on a   
   square wave it will read approximately ? the P-P value but on a sine wave it   
   will read lower, 0.   
   70711 of ? the P-P value. Almost any meter has the resolution to discern 1   
   volt from 0.71 volt.   
   >   
   > You do have a scope right ? If not you'll have to figure out a way to clip a   
   sine wave. You don't need any power behind it, a Zener or stack  of diodes   
   will do. A scope is the best way though. If you have to wing it come back and   
   I will try to figure    
   out the easiest way.   
      
    you see youy are only partially correct.   
      
    a 50% D square wave form = Vp *  1/sqrt(2)   
      
    a RMS meter does not display 50% as you pointed out.   
      
    but, other references I've ran into will also state that the   
    RMS of a Square wave = VP, but that only applies to one half of the   
   complete cycle.   
      
     Have fun..   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca