Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,765 of 72,318    |
|    George Herold to Tom Gardner    |
|    Re: x100 'scope probe    |
|    25 Sep 18 08:20:17    |
      From: gherold@teachspin.com              On Tuesday, September 25, 2018 at 11:06:40 AM UTC-4, Tom Gardner wrote:       > On 25/09/18 15:34, George Herold wrote:       > > I was thinking of making a DC (slow) x100 'scope probe by adding a       > > series 100 meg ohm resistor. Any thing I should look out for?       > >       > > George H.       > >       >       > Don't forget the point David Hess frequently makes...       >       > If you are relying on the scope's 10Mohm input resistance       > to form the lower leg of the potential divider, then consider       > what happens if you turn the scope to AC input coupling. The       > *entire* input voltage appears across the scope's AC coupling       > capacitor.       >       Huh, I'm not seeing that at all. Don't I still have 1 meg to       ground inside the scope? (putting my DMM across my 'scope input       I measure 1 meg ohm for both DC and AC coupling.)              George H.       > That can and should be avoided by having a probe with the       > potential divider made from two resistors, one for the upper       > leg and the other is (in parallel with the scope/s input)       > the lower leg. Then if the scope is in AC mode the voltage       > "seen" by the scope will be slightly wrong, but the voltage       > will be limited by the potential divider.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca