Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.electronics.basics    |    Elementary questions about electronics    |    72,318 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 70,941 of 72,318    |
|    Bret Cahill to All    |
|    Re: Cycling Safety Transponder, 15m - 45    |
|    25 Feb 19 10:11:56    |
      From: bretcahill@aol.com              > >> >The Bike Shield app never caught on because of spotty data in scenic       areas. Also some cyclists don't like posting their GPS.       > >> >       > >> >A transponder is the same thing as a bike light except it's at radio       frequencies, works around curves day or night, and motor vehicles tune in to       the frequency posted on the "Share the Road; Get Cyclist Alerts At AM 1090"       sign.       > >> >       > >> >It would require a dedicated receiver but it would be nice to give the       motorist a clue as to the distance to the cyclist around the curve, hidden       behind trees, so 3 different frequencies at 3 different power levels could       more or less indicate 3        different ranges, 40 - 50 m, 25-35m and 5-20 m.       > >> >       > >> >The GA needs an idea of the cost on a production run basis.       > >       > >> Are you proposing that every vehicle and every person have a       > >> transponder?        > >       > >If you just wanted to go with one frequency for one range, say 30 m, then       the motorist could, if he wanted, tune into the AM channel posted on the       CalTrans sign just like getting traffic and other information.       > >       > >Even with the 3 range system it could still be totally voluntary for both       cyclists and motorists. The motorist could opt out of the dedicated receiver       and not tune in to AM either.       >        > Cool. You'd be actively training drivers to kill the peds and cyclists       > who don't have transponders.              That was certainly the case when bike lights first appeared. In some ways       it's even more true today when up to a third of riders still ride w/o lights       _because_ it's now illegal.               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~              VC 21201, Requirements for Bicycle Equipment              California sets certain minimum requirements for bicycles that operate on       public roadways. These include:               Each bike must have a brake that will allow a cyclist to stop one wheel on       clean, dry, level pavement.        A bike must have handlebars that rest below the user’s shoulder level.        A user’s bicycle must be an appropriate size that allows the operator to       safely use it in an upright position, with the ability to put one foot on the       ground.        Any bicycle that operates on a highway or public roadway in the dark must       have a lamp emitting white light, a red reflector on the rear of the bicycle,       and white or yellow reflectors on the pedals. A rider may attach a white light       illuminating lamp        to himself or herself in lieu of the first requirement.              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~              The law needs to be updated for lights as well as transponders because a rear       red light is more valuable than the front white light. Any rider who isn't       using any lights is either suicidal and/or doesn't want to be visible. I       often keep extra $1 button        cell lights and give them to any nearby gubers who don't have one. They can       turn it on after a cop pulls them over.              The City of Tucson - Pima Cnty is very cycling friendly, providing free       training, free lunch and I believe free bike lights.                     Bret Cahill              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca